E-Assessment, Inequity and Accountability in the New Normal Era and Beyond in Nigerian Universities

Authors

  • Abdul-Wahab Ibrahim Department of Education, Sule Lamido University, P.M.B. 048, Nigeria
  • Abdullahi Iliyasu Department of Education, Sule Lamido University, P.M.B. 048, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v1i3.277

Keywords:

new normal, e-assessment, inequity, accountability, fairness

Abstract

The study examined the perceived conduct of e-assessment of undergraduate courses in Nigerian universities and compared access to e-assessment among undergraduate students in universities in the country. It also determined the relationship between e-assessment-based accountability and test fairness in the conduct of e-assessment in Nigerian universities. These were with a view to improving the assessment outcome directed towards certifying the quality in education by the Nigerian universities. The study adopted a mixed research approach combining both descriptive survey and focus group designs. The population consisted of all undergraduate students who registered for their degree courses at the government and privately-owned universities during 2019/2020 academic session. The sample consisted of intact classes of 450 Parts 2, 3, and 4 undergraduate students who registered for their degree courses. A 32-item self-developed instrument was used in the study. The qualitative data was collected via focus group. Data were analysed using independent t-test, and Pearson Product Moment Correlation statistical methods. The results showed that there existed a significant difference in students’ perception of the conduct of e-assessment in Nigerian universities. Also, there was a significant difference in access to e-assessment among undergraduate students in the universities. Further, a significant relationship existed between e-assessment-based accountability and test fairness in the conduct of e-assessment in Nigerian universities. The study concluded that improper conduct of e-assessment forms a major threat to the fairness and validity of online assessment of students. It was recommended that universities’ Management should employ equitable strategies in the design, development and administration of the e-assessment on campuses in the country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, G., & Arsenault, N. (1998). Qualitative research. Fundamentals of educational research, 2, 119-135.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.

Evertson, C. M. (2001). Relationship between classroom behaviour and student outcome in junior high school mathematics and English language. American Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 43-60.

Ibrahim, A. (2021). Investigating educational significance of e-learning in Nigerian universities post-COVID-19: Implications for assuring quality e-assessment. E-Journal of Education, 9, 207-218.

Ibrahim, A., & Hudu, S. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic: The exigency of e-learning and challenges in Nigerian public and privately-owned primary and secondary schools. In A. O. Ekong, S. M. Usen, & E. N. Essien (Eds.), Developing alternative teaching: Continuity plans to move classrooms online at Covid-19 era in Nigeria (pp.217-227). Benchmark Educational Services.

Ibrahim, A., & Saleh, B.A. (2020). Schooling process: Is schooling experience and its outcome the same for girls and boys? Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science (RISS) Journal, 1(2), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v1i2.80

Ibrahim, A. (2019). Scaling up assessment for learning implementation in tertiary institutions for sustainable national development. Premier Journal of Education, 2(1), 1-18.

www.benchmarkjournals.com

Ibrahim, A. (2018). Improving assessment and evaluation skills of public-school teachers in Jigawa State. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(11), 22-32. www.iiste.org

Ibrahim, A. (2014). The students’ perception of teachers’ classroom effectiveness on their self- concepts in Lagos metropolis. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(2), 133- 141. http://journals.uob.edu.bh

National Academy of Education (NAEd) (2021). Educational assessments in the COVID-19 era and beyond. NAEd. Forum Series. naeducation.org

Okoroafor, B. O. (2021). Ensuring fair assessment practices: Implications for high-stakes examination. Jigawa Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(1), 78-91.

Okoroafor, B.O. (2020). E-Assessment, uses and implementation challenges in higher institutions in Nigeria. Jigawa Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 1-11.

Schachter, S. (2008). Cognitive effects of bodily functioning. In K. Doyle Jr. (Eds.), Interaction: Readings in human psychology (pp. 145-148). D.C. Health and company.

Upadhya, B., & Singh, Y.K. (2008). Advanced educational psychology. APH Publishing Corporation.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), (2020). COVID-19 education response: How many students are at risk of not returning to school? Advocacy Paper, 6-8.

Winkley, J. (2010). E-assessment and innovation. emergingtechnologies.becta.org.uk

Downloads

Published

2021-12-26

How to Cite

Ibrahim, A.-W., & Iliyasu , A. . (2021). E-Assessment, Inequity and Accountability in the New Normal Era and Beyond in Nigerian Universities. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 1(3), 158-166. https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v1i3.277

Issue

Section

Articles