Adapting Education: Navigating Hybrid Classrooms in The Post-Pandemic Era

Authors

  • Yunias Monika Department of English, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, 11470, Indonesia
  • Septian Bayu Kristanto Accounting Department, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, 11470, Indonesia | Center of Tax and Accounting Studies, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, 11470, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v4i2.1275

Keywords:

Collaborative learning, Community of inquiry, Flexibility, Hybrid classroom, Student perception

Abstract

Hybrid classrooms are designed to support collaborative learning experiences. This concept encourages students to actively engage within learning communities. This study investigates the applicability of hybrid classrooms in a university. Researchers utilized a CoI questionnaire adapted from Swan et al., (2008). It contains 36 items, all measured on a 4-point Likert scale. The questionnaires measure the three components of the CoI model. The participants consisted of accounting students who enrolled in Taxation courses in 2023, totaling 140 individuals. This result finds that students have effective social interaction, active engagement, and critical inquiry in the hybrid classroom. Students expressed a positive sentiment towards the hybrid classroom. The hybrid classroom undeniably has great potential for a flexible learning model for both students and educators in the future. While this study offers valuable insights into the perceptions of students regarding the hybrid classroom, the limitations, lack of demographic data, reliance on self-report measures, and absence of qualitative data, must be acknowledged when interpreting the findings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003

Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers and Education, 86, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006

Butnaru, G. I., Haller, A. P., Dragolea, L. L., Anichiti, A., & Hâr?an, G. D. T. (2021). Students’ wellbeing during transition from onsite to online education: Are there risks arising from social isolation? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189665

Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 Years of the Community of Inquiry Framework. TechTrends, 64(4), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7

Chen, R. H. (2022). Effects of Deliberate Practice on Blended Learning Sustainability: A Community of Inquiry Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031785

Collazos, C. A., Fardoun, H., Alsekait, D., Pereira, C. S., & Moreira, F. (2021). Designing online platforms supporting emotions and awareness. Electronics (Switzerland), 10(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030251

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale Development: Theory and Application (5th ed.). SAGE.

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & Tadeu, P. (2022). Online education in higher education: emerging solutions in crisis times. Heliyon, 8(8), e10139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10139

Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online Community of Inquiry Review: Social, Cognitive, and Teaching Presence Issues. Online Learning Journal, 11(1), 61-72.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 11–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.002

Huizinga, T., Lohuis, A., Zwerver-Bergman, J., & van der Meer, R. (2022). Student and teacher perceptions of community of inquiry in hybrid virtual classrooms. Heliyon, 8(12), e12549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12549

Kalmar, E., Aarts, T., Bosman, E., Ford, C., de Kluijver, L., Beets, J., Veldkamp, L., Timmers, P., Besseling, D., Koopman, J., Fan, C., Berrevoets, E., Trotsenburg, M., Maton, L., van Remundt, J., Sari, E., Omar, L. W., Beinema, E., Winkel, R., & van der Sanden, M. (2022). The COVID-19 paradox of online collaborative education: when you cannot physically meet, you need more social interactions. Heliyon, 8(1), e08823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08823

Kaul, M., Aksela, M., & Wu, X. (2018). Dynamics of the community of inquiry (CoI) within a massive open online course (MOOC) for in-service teachers in environmental education. Education Sciences, 8(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020040

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. http://www.tpck.org/.

Le Roux, I., & Nagel, L. (2018). Seeking the best blend for deep learning in a flipped classroom – viewing student perceptions through the Community of Inquiry lens. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0098-x

Molano, S., & Polo, A. (2015). Social Network Analysis in a Learning Community. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 185, 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.381

Raes, A. (2022). Exploring Student and Teacher Experiences in Hybrid Learning Environments: Does Presence Matter? Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0

Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020a). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z

Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2020b). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers & Education, 143, 103682. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682

Shea, P., Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2022). Building bridges to advance the Community of Inquiry framework for online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089989

Shi, Y., Tong, M., & Long, T. (2021). Investigating relationships among blended synchronous learning environments, students’ motivation, and cognitive engagement: A mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 168, 104193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104193

Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the Community of Inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001

Sunitha, P., Ahmad, N., Barbhuiya, R. K., Gunjan, V. K., & Ansari, M. D. (2022). Impact of Covid-19 on Education. In A. Kumar & S. Mozar (Eds.), ICCCE 2021 (pp. 1191–1197). Springer Nature Singapore.

Swan, K. P., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. Ben. (2008). Validating a Measurement Tool of Presence in Online Communities of Inquiry. E-Mentor, 24(2), 1–12. www.e-mentor.edu.pl/eng

Thymniou, A., & Tsitouridou, M. (2021). Community of Inquiry Model in Online Learning: Development Approach in MOOCs. In T. Tsiatsos, S. Demetriadis, A. Mikropoulos, & V. Dagdilelis (Eds.), Research on E-Learning and ICT in Education: Technological, Pedagogical and Instructional Perspectives (pp. 93–109). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64363-8_6

Triyason, T., Tassanaviboon, A., & Kanthamanon, P. (2020). Hybrid Classroom: Designing for the New Normal after COVID-19 Pandemic. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advances in Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406601.3406635

Vital-López, L., García-García, R., Rodríguez-Reséndíz, J., Paredes-García, W. J., Zamora-Antuñano, M. A., Oluyomi-Elufisan, T., Reséndiz, H. R., Sánchez, A. R. Á., & Cruz-Pérez, M. A. (2022). The Impacts of COVID-19 on Technological and Polytechnic University Teachers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(8), 4593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084593

Wang, H. (2005). A qualitative exploration of the social interaction in an online learning community. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 79–88.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-26

How to Cite

Monika, Y., & Kristanto, S. B. (2024). Adapting Education: Navigating Hybrid Classrooms in The Post-Pandemic Era. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 4(2), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v4i2.1275

Issue

Section

Articles