Comparative Study on the Accuracy of Terrestrial and Global Gravitational Models (GGMs) Gravity Anomalies for Akure Environs, Ondo State, Nigeria

Ibrahim Olatunji Raufu; Herbert Tata; Korede Samuel Buraimoh

doi:10.52562/injoes.2025.1337

Authors

Ibrahim Olatunji Raufu Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Lead City University, Ibadan, Nigeria
Herbert Tata Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria
Korede Samuel Buraimoh Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52562/injoes.2025.1337

Keywords:

Gravity Anomalies, Global Gravitational Model, Terrestrial, Accuracy

Abstract

Spherical harmonic expansion is a mathematical method used to describe Earth's gravity field, derived from potential coefficients observed both on Earth's surface and from space. The International Centre for Gravity Earth Models (ICGEM) publishes Global Gravitational Models (GGMs), which require validation using terrestrial data to assess their suitability in specific regions. This study evaluates and compares gravity anomalies derived from five GGMs (EGM 2008, GECO, XGM2019e-2159, SGG-UGM-2, and EIGEN-6C4) with terrestrial gravity data over the Akure area of Ondo State, Nigeria. Gravity values and geodetic coordinates from 23 stations were analyzed. Terrestrial gravity data were sourced from previous field surveys, while GGM data were obtained from the International Centre for Global Earth Gravity Model (ICGEM). The study computed and compared free-air and Bouguer anomalies with mean differences ranging from -1.725 to 6.800 mGal (with standard errors between 1.058 to 1.965 mGal) for free-air anomalies, and -2.107 to 4.546 mGal (with standard errors between 0.773 to 1.041 mGal) for Bouguer anomalies. Statistical analyses revealed that the EGM 2008, GECO, and XGM 2019e-2159 models provided the best-fit with terrestrial measurements. These models can thus serve as reliable alternatives or complements to terrestrial gravity data for geoid determination in the Akure region. The study identifies EGM2008, GECO, and XGM2019e_2159 as the most suitable GGMs for geophysical applications in this area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd-Elmotaal, H. A., Seitz, K., Kühtreiber, N., & Heck, B. (2019). AFRGDB_V2. 0: the gravity database for the geoid determination in Africa. In International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World: Proceedings of the IAG Scientific Assembly, Kobe, Japan, July 30–August 4, 2017 (pp. 61-70). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2018_29

Apeh, O. I., Moka, E. C., & Uzodinma, V. N. (2018). Evaluation of gravity data derived from global gravity field models using terrestrial gravity data in Enugu State, Nigeria. Journal of Geodetic Science, 8(1), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2018-0015

Apeh, O.I. & Tenzer, R. (2022). Development of tailored gravity model based on global gravitational and topographic models and terrestrial gravity data for geophysical exploration of southern Benue trough in southeast Nigeria. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 198, 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104561

Barthelmes, F. (2013). Definition of functional of the geopotential and their calculation from spherical harmonic models: Theory and formulas used by the International Center for Global Earth Model (ICGEM). Scientific Technical Report, STR09/02, Revised Edition.

Foerste, C., Bruinsma, S., Abrykosov, O., & Lemoine, J.M. (2014). The latest combined global gravity field model including GOCE data up to degree and order 2190 of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse, 5th GOCE User Workshop Paris.

Gilardoni, M., Reguzzoni, M., & Sampietro, D. (2016). GECO: a global gravity model by locally combining GOCE data and EGM2008. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 60, 228-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-1114-4

Hackney, R. I., & Featherstone, W. E. (2003). Geodetic versus geophysical perspectives of the ‘gravity anomaly’. Geophysical Journal International, 154(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01941.x

Huang, J., & Véronneau, M. (2009). Evaluation of the GRACE-based global gravity models in Canada. Newton’s Bulletin, 4, 66-72.

Jekeli, C., Yang, H. J., & Kwon, J. H. (2013). Geoid determination in South Korea from a combination of terrestrial and airborne gravity anomaly data. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, 31(6_2), 567-576. https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2013.31.6-2.567

Kamto, P. G., Adiang, C. M., Nguiya, S., Kamguia, J., & Yap, L. (2020). Refinement of Bouguer anomalies derived from the EGM2008 model, impact on gravimetric signatures in mountainous region: Case of Cameroon Volcanic Line, Central Africa. Earth and Planetary Physics, 4(6), 639-650. https://doi.org/10.26464/epp2020065

Liang, W., Li, J., Xu, X., Zhang, S., & Zhao, Z. (2020). A high-resolution Earth’s gravity field model SGG-UGM-2 from GOCE, GRACE, satellite altimetry, and EGM2008. Engineering, 6(8), 860-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.008

Moka, E.C. & Apeh, O.I. (2017). Analysis of the fit of some global gravitational models (GGMs) over terrestrial gravity data of part of south east Nigeria. Nigeria Journal of Geodesy, 1(1).

Narayan, S., Sahoo, S. D., Pal, S. K., & Kumar, U. (2023). Comparative evaluation of five global gravity models over a part of the Bay of Bengal. Advances in Space Research, 71(5), 2416-2436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.11.002

Owoyemi, F. B., Olorunfemi, M. O., & Ojo, J. S. (2000). Geological and geophysical investigation of rain-induced erosion features: A case study of Akure town, Southwestern Nigeria. Geo Research Journal, 5, 54-82

Pavlis, N. K., Holmes, S. A., Kenyon, S. C., & Factor, J. K. (2012). The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of geophysical research: solid earth, 117(B4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008916

Saari, T., & Bilker-Koivula, M. (2015). Evaluation of GOCE-based global geoid models in finnish territory. EGU General Assembly Conference.

Šprlák, M., Gerlach, C., & Pettersen, B. (2012). Validation of GOCE global gravity field models using terrestrial gravity data in Norway. Journal of Geodetic Science, 2(2), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10156-011-0030-y

Tata, H., & Ono, M. N. (2018). A gravimetric approach for the determination of orthometric heights in Akure environs, Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 8(8), 75-80. http://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.8.8.2018.p8084

Tata, H., Ono, M. N., & Idowu, T. O. (2019). Development of a computational tool for the determination of the local geoid using gravimetric and GPS/Leveling approaches. Nigerian Journal of Geodesy, 3(1).

Tugi, A., Din, A. H. M., Omar, K. M., Mardi, A. S., Soma, Z. A. M., Omar, A. H., Yahaya, N. A. Z., & Yazid, N. (2016). Gravity anomaly assessment using GGMS and airborne gravity data towards bathymetry estimation. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-4/W1. International Conference on Geomatic and Geospatial Technology (GGT) 2016, 3–5 October 2016, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Wenzel, H. G. (2005). Global models of the gravity field of high and ultra-high resolution. In: International School for the Determination and Use of the Geoid, 31 January - 5 February 2005, Budapest, Hungary, International Geoid Service, 36 p.

Y?lmaz, M., & Kozlu, B. (2018). The comparison of gravity anomalies based on recent high-degree global models. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(3), 981-990.

Yilmaz, M., Turgut, B., Gullu, M., & Yilmaz, I. (2016). Evaluation of recent global geopotential models by GNSS/Levelling data: internal Aegean region. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 1(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.285221

Yilmaz, M., Yilmaz, I., & Uysal, M. (2018). The evaluation of gravity anomalies based on global models by land gravity data. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Geological and Environmental Engineering, 12(11).

Y?lmaz, N. (2023). Assessment of latest global gravity field models by GNSS/Levelling geoid. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 8(2), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1070042

Zingerle, P., Pail, R., Gruber, T., & Oikonomidou, X. (2020). The combined global gravity field model XGM2019e. Journal of geodesy, 94(7), 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01398-0